The Supreme Court, in the case of __________, has ruled that it can initiate contempt of court proceedings against High Court Judges who flout the order of the Supreme Court.

The correct answer is Spencer & Company v. Vishwadarshan Distributors (P) Ltd..

Key Points

• In the case of Spencer & Company v. Vishwadarshan Distributors (P) Ltd., the Supreme Court of India reiterated its authority to initiate contempt proceedings against High Court judges.
• The Supreme Court holds the constitutional power to ensure compliance with its judgments under Articles 129 and 142 of the Indian Constitution.
• This case became a landmark in establishing the principle that judicial discipline and adherence to the rule of law are paramount, even for High Court judges.
• It highlighted that the judicial hierarchy mandates High Courts to follow the binding nature of Supreme Court orders and judgments.
• The ruling ensures accountability in the judiciary and safeguards the authority of the Supreme Court as the apex court of the country.

Additional Information

• Contempt of Court:
  • It refers to acts of disobedience or disrespect towards the court's authority, judgments, or orders.
  • Contempt of court can be classified into two types: Civil Contempt (willful disobedience of court orders) and Criminal Contempt (acts that scandalize the court or lower its authority).
  • In India, contempt of court is governed by the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
• Article 129 of the Indian Constitution:
  • It declares the Supreme Court of India as a "court of record."
  • A court of record has the authority to punish for its own contempt and maintain judicial discipline.
• Article 142 of the Indian Constitution:
  • This article empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary to ensure "complete justice" in any case before it.
  • It is often used to enforce its rulings and ensure compliance with its judgments.
• Judicial Hierarchy in India:
  • The Indian judiciary is structured in a hierarchical manner with the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts and subordinate courts.
  • The principle of stare decisis (judicial precedent) mandates lower courts to follow the judgments of higher courts.
• Importance of Judicial Discipline:
  • Ensures consistency in legal interpretation and decision-making across courts.
  • Maintains the authority and credibility of the judiciary as an institution.
  • Prevents judicial anarchy by ensuring adherence to the rule of law.